Posts tagged Markets
Operating in a noisy environment

In most industrial settings, health-and-safety rules demand that appropriate protective gear be worn, including the donning of ear defenders in high decibel environments. Yet, when it comes to our investing health and safety, we have little by the way of regulatory guidance except the obligatory phrase ‘Past performance is no guide to future performance’ to protect ourselves from the noise of market outcomes, particularly when investing without the guidance of an advisor.

Investing in markets is a very noisy business and some form of ear defenders are required. Given that markets do a pretty good job incorporating information into prices, they tend to move randomly on the release of new information. Many investors are probably wondering today what returns will be like from equities in the final months of 2020 and perhaps next year too. Nobody knows (and do not believe anyone who claims to know). The chart below illustrates the monthly returns every year, from January 1970 to August 2020. As you can see, there is a lot of noise in the data.

Figure 1: Monthly returns of global developed market equities are very noisy

Data source: Morningstar Direct © All rights reserved (see endnote). MSCI World Index (gross) in GBP terms.

Data source: Morningstar Direct © All rights reserved (see endnote). MSCI World Index (gross) in GBP terms.

The only ear defenders that we have are behavioural. We must keep our true investment horizons – 20 to 30 years or more, in many cases - at the forefront of our minds, accept that investing is a two steps forward and one step back process and not look at our investment portfolios too frequently. The chart below shows that even on a yearly basis, returns from equities are noisy. The blue dots represent the calendar year returns and the red triangles represent the annualised return for the decade. Even the returns of decades are a bit noisy. Patience and fortitude are prerequisites for success.

Figure 2: Annual returns of global developed market equities are noisy too

Data source: Morningstar Direct © All rights reserved (see endnote). MSCI World Index (gross) in GBB terms.

Data source: Morningstar Direct © All rights reserved (see endnote). MSCI World Index (gross) in GBB terms.

Yet, over this period, global developed equity markets have delivered a return of 10.9% on an annualised basis before inflation and 6.5% after inflation (but before costs). Put another way, investors who stayed the course doubled their purchasing power every 12 years. With those sorts of longer-term returns, try not to let the noise of the markets keep you awake.

Risk warnings

This article is distributed for educational purposes and should not be considered investment advice or an offer of any security for sale. This article contains the opinions of the author but not necessarily the Firm and does not represent a recommendation of any particular security, strategy, or investment product.  Information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable but is not guaranteed. 

Past performance is not indicative of future results and no representation is made that the stated results will be replicated.

Good things come to those who wait.

Good things come to those who wait. This was the strapline once used by Guinness to refer to the 119.5 seconds it takes to pour a ‘perfect’ pint of their iconic stout. In investing, the time periods we are concerned about are measured in years, rather than seconds. Looking at your investment portfolio too often only increases the chance that you will be disappointed. This of course can be challenging at times, particularly during tumultuous markets.

We can see from the figure below that monitoring markets on a monthly basis looks rather stressful, as they yoyo through time. Green areas represent times during which the market is growing its purchasing power (i.e. beating inflation) and red areas when it is contracting.

Figure 1: Monthly real growth/contraction of global equities, Jan-88 to Jun-20

Data source: MorningstDar Direct © All rights reserved. MSCI World (net div.) net of UK CPI, before charges. Dividends reinvested.

Data source: MorningstDar Direct © All rights reserved. MSCI World (net div.) net of UK CPI, before charges. Dividends reinvested.

The evident month-on-month noise captured by the figure above is a consequence of new information being factored into prices on an ongoing basis. Investors around the world digest this information, decide whether it will cause a change in a company’s cashflows (or the risks to them occurring), and hold or trade the stock accordingly. These are the concerns of active investors casting judgements on individual stocks’ prospects.

Over longer holding periods, the day-to-day worries of more actively managed portfolios are erased, as equity markets generate wealth over the longer term. The figure below illustrates that monthly rolling 20-year holding periods has never resulted in a destruction of purchasing power. A longer-term view to investing enables individuals to spend more time focusing on what matters most to them and to avoid the anxiety of watching one’s portfolio movements.

Figure 2: Monthly rolling 20-year real growth/contraction of global equities, Jan-88 to Jun-20

Data source: Morningstar Direct © All rights reserved. MSCI World (net div.) net of UK CPI, before charges. Dividends reinvested.

Data source: Morningstar Direct © All rights reserved. MSCI World (net div.) net of UK CPI, before charges. Dividends reinvested.

This is not to say that investing is a set-and-forget process, however. The Investment Committee meets regularly on your behalf to kick the tyres of the portfolio, after reviewing any new evidence. Over time there may be incremental changes to your investments (there may not!) as a result, but the Committee shares the outlook illustrated in the figure above – we have structured your portfolio for the long term, and it is built to weather all storms.

Delving deeper

The figure below provides longer term market data in the US back to 1927. The result is the same. The cherry-picked 20-year example provided towards the bottom of the figure shows a time fresh in many investors’ minds: the bottom of the Credit Crisis. In this (extreme) 20-year period, to Feb-09, equity markets had barely recovered from the crash of technology stocks in the early 00s, before falling over 50% in 2008/9, in real terms. These were scary times.

Despite the headwinds, investors had been rewarded substantially for participating in the growth of capital markets over the longer term. An equity investor viewing their portfolio for the first time in 20 years would have seen their wealth more than double, whilst at the same time the media was reporting headlines such as ‘Worst Crisis Since ‘30s, with No End Yet in Sight’(1)

Have faith in wealth-creation through capitalism and try not to look at your portfolio too often. As the adage goes: ‘look at your cash daily if you need to, your bonds once per year, and stocks every ten’.

(1) Wall Street Journal, September 18, 2008

Figure 3: Long term US stock market growth in purchasing power

Data source: Morningstar Direct © IA SBBI US Large Stock Infl Adj TR Ext in USD. Market events: https://eu.usatoday.com/

Data source: Morningstar Direct © IA SBBI US Large Stock Infl Adj TR Ext in USD. Market events: https://eu.usatoday.com/

Commercial property in a post-Covid world

One of the most common questions that is currently asked by clients is what the prospects are for commercial property in the future. We have all by now – in our new normal world - got used to meeting our dearest friends, family, and work colleagues on Zoom or Skype, working from home, and shopping online.  High streets and shopping malls were struggling even before the events of 2020 with Debenhams and several middle-market food chains in trouble.

That has led some investors to beg the question as to what the future holds for commercial property. Will everyone work from home? Will companies reduce their office space needs, providing workers with a hot desk each morning, if they are in? Will retail companies go into administration to put pressure on landlords to reduce rents?  Will more people shop online? The answer to all of these questions is probably ‘yes’. Does that mean that we should abandon a well-diversified, liquid exposure to global commercial property accessed via real estate investment trusts (REITs), which are listed property companies, focused almost exclusively on generating rental income? We think not.

First, let us look at the flipside of the changes that are occurring. To be sure, some sectors may struggle.  But for every Debenhams, there will be a company moving into, or even starting up, online, which will require logistics centers and warehousing. In our digital age, there is increasing demand for secure and up-to-date data centers, improved and more numerous healthcare facilities for example. You can see from the chart below that the global commercial property REITs cover many things.

pic1.jpg

In a globally diversified REIT index fund, there are over 350 individual REITs (listed property companies) each of which is comparable to a property fund in its own right. It is estimated that such a fund contains around 90,000 properties[1] spread across property types, global markets, and strategies.

Second, let us spend a moment thinking about markets. These worries about the retail sector, for example, have been around for some time and you will not be the only person thinking about these issues. In fact, thousands - or even millions – of people will already have done so and acted on their view of the future of property, by buying and selling these REITs in the market. The aggregate view will be reflected in today’s REIT prices: all the doom, gloom and uncertainty is priced into the process of REITs already;  all the likelihood that the way we work changes is priced in already; and all the good news about data centers and warehousing is priced in already. So, the future prospects for commercial property will depend on what happens relative to this expectation.  It may be better or worse, depending on information we do not yet know. The release of that information is random. What we do know is that commercial property will continue to be needed and that companies will have to pay rent. We would not abandon owning a diversified equity portfolio because some sectors are struggling (airlines and energy) or concentrate our portfolio in sectors that are booming (technology). It is already in the price. Companies and sectors wax and wane.

Third, let us think about why we hold it in portfolios in the first place. Property tends to have a different return experience to equities (even though property companies are listed on stock markets). At specific times, and across time, this can provide diversification to a portfolio. In addition, over time property has provided protection from inflation; after all, a property is a property and many rental agreements are linked to some measure of inflation. With the rapid increase in the money supply, on account of all the government support packages around the world, higher inflation - not something most feel the need to worry about currently – is one future scenario. Cover the bases - but all things in moderation - is a sensible approach. An allocation to global commercial property still makes sense for long-term investors, as part of their diversified growth assets.

[1] Source: Prologis is the largest REIT at 5% of the index and owns ~4,500 properties.  Scaling this up implies around 90,000 properties across the index, as a rough proxy.

Risk warnings

This article is distributed for educational purposes and should not be considered investment advice or an offer of any security for sale. This article contains the opinions of the author but not necessarily the Firm and does not represent a recommendation of any particular security, strategy, or investment product.  Information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable but is not guaranteed. 

Past performance is not indicative of future results and no representation is made that the stated results will be replicated.