Have you read any market forecasts for 2020 yet? There is something about the turn of the calendar year that brings out the thumb-suckers in the media as sage reflection on the year just past gives way to blue-sky speculation about the coming 12 months.

To be sure, there is an economic element in this. Newsrooms tend to thin out over the holiday season as staff are told to clear accumulated leave. Media outlets stockpile think-piece fodder from bankers and brokers to fill the gaps between the ads for a few weeks. End-of-year specials are a popular go-to feature.

This is why you are confronted with clickbait headlines at this time like “Ten Big Economic Surprises for 2020” or “Five Stocks You Can Count on in the Coming Year” or “Your Armageddon Portfolio: Bunker Down with these Shares”.

Last year’s predictions

Actually, there were plenty of these types of headlines around Christmas 2018 following the global equity markets’ worst calendar year performance in seven years. The US-China trade war was heating up, the Brexit saga was roiling markets and there was mounting evidence of a significant global economic slowdown in the pipeline.

So on New Year’s Eve 2018, CNN pitched in with a guest economist’s column titled How Populism will Cause a Crisis in Markets in 2019.  The argument was that the impossibly simplistic solutions enacted by populist politicians to the post-GFC stagnation in developed economies would come home to roost in the coming year.

How things panned out

The analysis appeared sound, but a year on and we’re still waiting for the promised reality check. Equity markets have experienced double-digit gains in 2019. The US market has kept breaking records, to be up more than 20%. Against most expectations a year ago, bond markets have had another stellar year, with yields reaching unchartered territory.

To be fair, expectations that 2019 would mark a brutal reckoning for markets were widely held. In December 2018, a survey by Natixis Investment Managers said two thirds of institutional investors believed the US bull market would come to an end in the coming year.

The biggest threats cited were geopolitical disruptions, such as Brexit and trade wars, while rising interest rates were also seen as posing a significant risk.

A year on and those issues grind on. Markets vacillate according to every tweet from Donald Trump, though the UK election has taken some of the wind out of the Brexit issue. As for interest rates, they have spent most of the year falling, not rising.

The growth slowdown also triggered a wave of downgrades by major brokerages and banks in late 2018. Barclays won headlines when it lowered its year-end target for the S&P-500 to 2750 from 3000, citing bearish retail investor sentiment and slowing growth outside the US. Actually, they got it right first time and should have stuck to the original call because the index was above 3100 going into December, or about 25% higher over the year.

The cataclysm that wasn’t 

Every year, you see these calls go awry, perhaps none so spectacularly as the headline-grabbing line from the Royal Bank of Scotland in early 2016, telling clients in a research note to ‘sell everything’ in anticipation of a “cataclysmic” year in markets.

“Sell everything except high quality bonds,” the bank told clients. “This is about return of capital, not return on capital. In a crowded hall, exit doors are small.” 

It would have been a shame for those investors who followed that advice, because global equity markets delivered a return of about 8% that year in US dollar terms. In fact, the total return of equity markets from early 2016 to late 2019, as measured by the MSCI All Country World Index was more than 40%.

Opinions are soon out of date

The truth is everyone can have an opinion about the market outlook, but that’s all they are — opinions. And the problem with writing economic commentary on the run is you are always responding to news. Within a day of writing it, it’s usually out of date.

To be sure, there is still a case for economic analysis. The problem arises when you try to connect long-term analysis to short-term speculation about market direction. Markets respond to news based on the collective expectations of millions of participations. This is another way of saying all those opinions are already reflected in prices.

In any case, an economic or market forecast is inevitably based on a bunch of underlying assumptions, anyone of which can be thrown awry by events. Nothing really is constant, which is why forecasting is such a tough and unforgiving business.

Don’t indulge 

The media’s need for big market calls that attract eyeballs is easy to understand. We’re naturally drawn to the idea that someone out there can see the future clearly. The reality, unfortunately, is that no-one can. Everyone is guessing. 

Seasonal speculation is fun and diverting. But you’re better off choosing something else to indulge in.

Picture: Denise Karis via Unsplash

A key tactic in staying disciplined as an investor is developing the skill to separate short-term ephemera from long-term trends. A sharp drop in the market today, however disconcerting, is not important if your horizon is years away.

Highlighting the benefit of resisting the knee-jerk response to news is Warren Buffett, who once famously said that the most important quality for an investor is not intellect but temperament. 

He’s undoubtedly right. There are plenty of smart people in the investing world. But often the key difference between the successful and unsuccessful are not smarts, but patience.

Look at it this way. Most TV news bulletins conclude with two features — the finance report and the weather report. Both involve a person standing in front of a chart, describing what happened in the markets or meteorological conditions that day and what might happen tomorrow.

For sure, the weather is an interesting talking point in social situations. But we know longer-term that what counts is the climate and that this changes more gradually.

Likewise, what happened on the market today or yesterday is interesting. But if your horizon is 10 years or more it is unlikely to be as significant a factor as to how you allocate your assets, how diversified you are, and, most of all, how disciplined you can remain.

As investors, we spend a lot of time looking at the financial equivalent of weather reports, agonising over passing showers, and ignoring the long-term shifts in the investing climate.

In other words, our focus on today’s events reveals a tension between how we experience the passing of time day-to-day – through news and weather and market movements - and how time gradually shapes us and our investments in the long-term.

The difference between the two is in our temperament.

Check out more of the latest news from IFAMAX:

How women view money and investing differently

A little encouragement goes a long way

Weekly round-up: Week 48, 2019

What will happen in the global financial markets tomorrow, next week or over the coming month?  It’s tempting to speculate, isn’t it? Indeed, speculation about the short-term direction of shares, bonds, currencies and commodities represents a good chunk of the output of the financial media every day.

To be fair, people have a natural curiosity about the future, particularly when their is money at risk. This makes it understandable that the media would seek to satisfy that need in its coverage.

Markets are inherently uncertain

The problem is financial markets are inherently uncertain. Prices move randomly in the short term and there is little to be gained for investors by trying to second-guess them.

This point is easier to understand if you reflect on the fact that what moves prices is news. It might be an earnings report involving an individual company, a regulatory ruling affecting an industry, a data release relating to an entire economy or a geopolitical development that affects the whole world. 

Prices are always changing as new information comes into the market. And the biggest changes in prices tend to occur on the news that no-one expected. For example, opinion polls might suggest a certain political party is certain to win a major election. Markets will price for that eventuality. But if there is an upset, prices will adjust very quickly.

An impossible task

What this means is that successfully speculating on short-term movements in security prices with any consistency requires an ability to accurately forecast the news. We’re not sure about you, but we’ve yet to meet such a person.

But it’s even harder than that! Even if you could forecast the outcome of news events — say a G7 statement or an interest rate change or a merger — you still need to be able to forecast how the market will react.

Now that’s especially tough because what moves prices is the degree to which the news lines up with what’s priced in. You might get a weak employment figure, for instance, but the share market might still rally if the headline figure is not outside the bounds of expectations.

The fiendish difficulty of forecasting markets is also partly because set-piece events that dominate media attention do not tend to occur in isolation. A big economic announcement might have been expected all week, but what if it is overshadowed on the day by a development in the Middle East that upends the oil market and drives equity prices lower?

We look for tidy narratives

In fairness, we doubt the media will ever give up on constructing speculative “stories” about markets by linking fundamental news about the economy or earnings to price changes. It fills a niche and there’s a real appetite among the public for tidy narratives that link cause and effect.

But for the individual investor it is best to distinguish between the daily noise of news and security price movements from the long-term signal of capital market returns. The latter are more predictable.

We know that over time, there is a return on investment. If capital markets did not ultimately reward investors, there would be no appeal in investment!

But the returns are not there every day, every week or even every year. Timing them is tough. What’s more, we don’t need know which individual asset classes, markets or securities will deliver the strongest returns next.

Like a patchwork quilt

This is best illustrated by the Periodic Table of Investment Returns, from Callan Associates in California. This shows the annual returns for various asset classes over 20 years, defined by indexes and grouped by colour.

Each column illustrates the returns for each year. Those with the biggest returns are at the top and those with the lowest are at the bottom. It looks like a patchwork quilt, doesn’t it? In fact, it’s hard to see any pattern at all.

Sometimes, emerging markets will top the table. Other years, it will be cash or bonds or real estate. The long-term premiums from these assets are available, but they are not evenly distributed.

Diversification is key

That means to succeed as a long-term investor, you need to take a bigger picture view, focusing firstly on how you allocate your capital across different asset classes like stocks, bonds, property and cash and secondly on ensuring you are diversified within these asset classes.

By having a little bit of all those asset classes, you are guaranteed to reap the returns when they do kick in and you don’t have to worry about market timing.

Finally, success over the long-term requires discipline and sticking to the plan that is made for you, attending to what you can control (asset allocation, diversification, cost, taxes and rebalancing) and ignoring as much as you can the daily noise that preoccupies the media.

By the way, this doesn’t mean you shouldn’t take an interest in the news. We all want to know what’s going on in the world after all. But it’s a caution against using daily news headlines to drive your investment strategy. 

Prices, like news, are simply unpredictable.

Check out more of the latest news from IFAMAX:

Pay less attention to weather forecasts

How women view money and investing differently

A little encouragement goes a long way